Serena and Venus Williams' US Open Thriller Leaves One Big Comeback Question
GOATIFYShare
Serena and Venus Williams gave Arthur Ashe Stadium exactly what it wanted from their long-awaited US Open doubles reunion: a three-hour fight, a late comeback and enough drama to make a first-round match feel like one of the biggest events of the tournament.
The result did not go their way. Maya Joint and Hao-Ching Chan survived the Williams sisters 6-3, 6-7(6), 7-6(7), ending the Americans' run in the opening round. But the defeat did not make the comeback feel small. Serena and Venus pushed the No. 14 seeds to the final match tiebreak, recovered from trouble several times and briefly looked capable of stealing the match late.
For Serena in particular, the loss added another complicated chapter to a return that has mixed nostalgia, flashes of elite-level competitiveness and clear reminders of how difficult it is to come back after years away from the tour. She has now faced Joint twice during this comeback—once in singles at Wimbledon and again in doubles in New York—and lost both meetings.
What happens next remains unclear. Serena has repeatedly said she is taking the return one match at a time, but the US Open defeat also revived a separate question: how much of the old competitive Serena is still driving this comeback, even when she says winning and losing are not the only reasons she is playing?
Serena and Venus Turned a First-Round Doubles Match Into a Three-Hour Thriller
The Williams sisters did not ease quietly back into Grand Slam doubles.
Chan and Joint controlled the opening stages and took the first set 6-3, putting Serena and Venus in an immediate hole. The sisters were still trying to find rhythm as a team, and the sharper pair across the net took advantage of that hesitation.
The second set changed the tone. Serena and Venus became more comfortable holding serve, created more pressure in return games and pushed the set into a tiebreak. Even there, the match looked capable of slipping away. The sisters held a 6-4 lead in the breaker before errors brought the score back level.
They still found a way through.
That forced a third set and gave the Arthur Ashe crowd another chance to pull the match toward the home legends. Chan and Joint responded by moving 4-1 ahead, but Serena and Venus refused to disappear. Three straight games brought the match back to 4-4.
Neither team broke again, so everything came down to the final 10-point match tiebreak.
The Williams sisters surged ahead 5-0 and suddenly looked one short run away from completing the comeback. Instead, Chan and Joint won eight of the next nine points. Serena later pushed a forehand long to create match point, and Chan finished the contest at the net.
The loss came with obvious frustration because the opportunity was there. Serena and Venus were five points ahead in the final breaker and had the stadium fully behind them. But the quality of the match also made it clear that their partnership still has enough level to challenge strong doubles teams.
Maya Joint Has Now Beaten Serena Twice During the Comeback
Joint has become an unlikely recurring opponent in Serena's comeback.
Serena faced the young Australian in singles at Wimbledon and lost in three sets. Now, only a few months later, Joint has beaten her again in a completely different format, this time alongside Chan against both Williams sisters.
The two matches are difficult to compare directly. Singles and doubles ask different questions, Serena had Venus beside her in New York, and Chan is an experienced doubles player who gave Joint a strong partner for the US Open matchup.
Still, the coincidence is striking. Serena has played only a limited number of competitive matches since returning, yet Joint has been on the other side of two of the most important losses.
The US Open defeat also showed the gap between producing elite moments and sustaining them across an entire match. Serena still generated power, handled pressure stretches and helped force the third-set tiebreak. But the Williams team also finished with more unforced errors than Chan and Joint, and those mistakes became increasingly expensive late.
That is one of the central challenges of the comeback. Serena does not need to prove that she can still hit a world-class shot. She has already done that repeatedly. The harder part is building enough match rhythm to make the level hold together from the first game to the last.
Joint and Chan were just consistent enough to punish the dips. The Williams sisters had the louder crowd, the larger legacy and the biggest emotional moments. The seeded pair had the final point.
Serena's Return Has Produced Results, Rust and Plenty of Attention
Serena's comeback was never going to look like a normal season.
She returned to competitive tennis in June after years away from regular tour life, initially focusing heavily on doubles. The early results included a win at Queen's Club alongside Victoria Mboko, more doubles appearances in Berlin and Cincinnati, and a singles return at Wimbledon.
New York then added another level of attention. Serena teamed with Carlos Alcaraz in mixed doubles, winning their opening match before losing in the quarterfinals. The pairing was one of the most marketable combinations the tournament could create: a 23-time Grand Slam singles champion next to one of the defining stars of the current men's game.
Then came the reunion with Venus.
Serena and Venus had not played US Open doubles together since 2022, so simply seeing them back on the same side of the court became an event. Their careers are already complete by any normal measure. Together they won 14 Grand Slam women's doubles titles and never lost a Grand Slam doubles final.
That history is why every comeback match carries unusual expectations. Nobody realistically expects two players in their mid-40s to reproduce the peak version of a partnership that once overwhelmed the sport. But the crowd reacts to them as if a major match could still happen at any moment.
The three-hour battle against Joint and Chan only strengthened that feeling. They did not return merely for a ceremonial appearance. They competed hard enough to get within a few points of winning.
The Bigger Question Is What Serena Wants From the Next Match
Serena has repeatedly resisted turning this return into a traditional comeback plan with a fixed destination.
She has said she is enjoying being back, seeing what her body can handle and taking the schedule match by match. She has also connected the return to showing her children the joy she still gets from competing.
That does not mean losing suddenly feels irrelevant.
One of the tensions around Serena's return is that she remains one of the most competitive athletes tennis has ever produced. The idea that results are secondary can coexist with enjoying the experience, but a close loss still looks capable of hitting differently when a match is there to be won.
That tension became part of the conversation again after the US Open doubles defeat because Serena did not speak to reporters after the match. She had also skipped the post-match media opportunity after her Wimbledon loss to Joint.
That choice has drawn criticism because post-match media obligations are part of normal tour life, especially after losses. Serena's status is unique, but so is the attention surrounding every match she plays. When she does not speak afterward, the questions do not disappear; they simply get answered through speculation instead.
The most important question is still the simplest one: does she want another match?
Nothing about the US Open performance suggested that Serena and Venus came back only for a symbolic appearance. They played for more than three hours, fought from behind, forced the deciding tiebreak and came close to winning it.
If Serena wants to keep going, the competitive level is clearly high enough to make future appearances interesting. If this was one of the final chapters, the Williams sisters still gave New York the kind of match that made the crowd reluctant to see them leave.
For now, there is no neat ending. Serena's return remains what she has said it is: one match at a time.







